The last in this series that I’ve actually done before. Plus a couple
that are possibly new. I’m way too lazy to double check, though. In any case,
all words come from the Proto Indo European bher-,
to carry.
First, indifferent. We already looked at the weirdness that is differ,
and now we’re going to see why putting in- in front of it makes it so different
from the not alike definition of differ. It showed up in the late fourteenth century—indifference showed up a
bit later, in the mid fifteenth century—meaning
impartial when it referred to people, and alike or equal when referring to
things. In other words, the opposite of differ, with the in- prefix meaning notor opposite of. Apparently, two things
being alike means there’s no preference for one or the other, which means
you’re neutral towards them. Eh, less weird than differ.
Next, circumference showed up in the late fourteenth century from the classical Latin circumferentia, circumference.
It’s from circumferre, to carry around,
a mix of the prefix circum-, around
in Latin,
and ferre, to carry or bear.
They really didn’t bother changing much with this one.
Vociferous showed up in the early seventeenth century, well after vociferation in the fifteenth century even though I didn’t realize that was a word. The words are both from the
classical Latin vociferari, to shout,
which is a mix of vox (voice)
and ferre. To carry a voice. Has anyone even used vociferous lately?
Maybe proliferate will be more interesting. It showed up rather
recently, in 1857, as a term in
biology. It comes from the
French prolifération, which is just proliferation,
and that is actually a mix of the classical Latin proles, offspring,
and ferre. So proliferation is to carry or bear offspring. Nope, not more
interesting.
In that vein, there’s fertile, which shoed up in the mid fifteenth century from the Old French fertil and classical Latin fertilis, which means fertile or productive. And that’s from ferre and so bher-. Man, how
did this week turn out even more boring than last week?
So that’s the end of the -fer redux words. There are actually a ton
more words related to bher-, but I think I’ll take a break from them and look
at something else for a while. I’ll get to them eventually!
Sources
Online Etymology Dictionary
Google Translate
Omniglot
University of Texas at Austin Linguistic Research Center
University of Texas at San Antonio’s page on Proto Indo European language
Online Etymology Dictionary
Google Translate
Omniglot
University of Texas at Austin Linguistic Research Center
University of Texas at San Antonio’s page on Proto Indo European language
It's a little boring when it all makes perfect sense.
ReplyDeleteThere's no reason your part 4 needs to directly follow part 3.
ReplyDeleteVociferous is one of those proverbial 25 dollar words nobody uses.
ReplyDelete