Well, I did fast. Might as well look at the other side of
things. Although I had a harder time coming up with words related to moving
slowly. Isn’t that weird?
Slow
Slow showed up as a verb in the mid sixteenth century,
and as the adjective we more commonly know it as sometime before the thirteenth
century. It comes from the Old English slaw, which means slow,
and before that it was the Proto Germanic slaewaz. Nothing particularly
surprising here. Let’s go look at some other words related to slowing down.
Inert
Inert showed up in the mid seventeenth century meaning without force or with no power to respond. It comes from the French inerte or the classical Latin inertem, which could mean unskilled,inactive, or indolent. It also
happens to be a mix of the prefix in-, meaning “the opposite of” here,
and ars, art.
Inert is being the opposite of art.
Brake
Brake showed up in the mid fifteenth century as an “instrument for crushing or pounding”. Which…is that how car brakes work?
Apparently the word used to be used to refer to the ring through the nose of an
ox, and was influenced by an Old French word, brac/bras, an arm. The arm was
a lever, which became a brake, which became a word for bridle or curb before
becoming a “stopping device for a wheel” in 1772. Anyway, brake comes from the
Middle Dutch braeke, flax break, related to breken, to break. And that’s related to
break, just kind of distantly.
Slug
Slug is kind of a weird word. It’s a bug, a piece of metal,
a punch…What the hell? Oh, and the word for the thing that slithers on the
ground? It didn’t mean that until the eighteenth century. Three hundred years
earlier it was a lazy person,
coming from sluggard. That word comes from the Middle English sluggi, which in addition to being
the most awesome possibility for a plural of slug meant sluggish or indolent,
and is believed to be Scandinavian in origin, although no one’s sure exactly
which word it might be from.
Lazy
Speaking of lazy, that word showed up in the mid sixteenth century as laysy, referring to people who
were, well, lazy. Before that…no one really knows. Some people think it’s from the
word lay, some think it’s from a Germanic word, or maybe Norse…It just kind of
showed up one day.
Sources
Tony Jebson’s page on the Origins of Old English
A slug was a person before it was a snail without a home? Funny.
ReplyDeleteThe opposite of art. Art is creation, so I guess inert - doing nothing - would be the opposite.
It's fitting that lazy should have no particularly convoluted history!
ReplyDeleteLove the laysy spelling.
ReplyDeleteSo we could say that "inert" is those without art?
ReplyDeleteSo most people.
Words just show up out of nowhere? That's pretty cool, actually.
ReplyDeleteInert is the opposite of art in the sense of the opposite of being?
ReplyDelete