As I’m sure I mentioned, I started
on a new project and instead of being apocalyptic or post-apocalyptic, it’s
urban fantasy (gasp!) with an apocalyptic twist. Now, I’ve written urban
fantasy before, but that was a long time ago, before I had a good grasp on
writing. I’m still getting a feel for the story, but I like how it’s going.
Plus I realized that it was still speculative fiction, which is most definitely
my forte.
But “speculative fiction” is a funny
title. Yes, what I’m writing is pretty close to what I usually do, but why are
fantasy and apocalyptic under the same classification? If you look at something
like LORD OF THE RINGS, you’re not going to mistake it for THE HUNGER GAMES. They’re
nothing alike.
It happens that speculative fiction is
basically the catch all term for any genre with things happening that don’t
really happen. Or, as in the case of alternate history, didn’t really happen.
Then you can get into the subgenres
and things get even more complicated. The family tree I posted up there hardly
encompasses all the speculative offshoots. Science fantasy, dark fantasy (horror
fantasy), and all the crosses with non-speculative genres. Suffice to say, it’s
one incestuous family tree.
Really, as a name, speculative
fiction doesn’t say much. Science fiction is speculative. Horror is
speculative. But science fiction isn’t necessarily horror, nor vice versa.
Unless the genres are deliberately joined, like the sci-fi horror movie Alien, they are separate creatures that for
some reason share the share a genre.
Sometimes I wonder if speculative
fiction is needed at all. The term, of course, not the books. I think we all
know how important those are! But why such a broad classing? Is it necessary?
Or useful? I’m not so sure. What do you think?