How about we etymologize some evil
things, because why not?
Evil itself showed up in Old English as yfel, which was actually pronounced
pretty much like evil and was also spelled evel in the Kentish dialect of Old
English. It comes from the Proto
Germanic ubilaz and Proto Indo European upelo-, which is from the root wap-, bad or evil.
If you want another example of that
f-v thing, then you can also look at devil, which was deofol/deoful in Old
English. Except that word came to English via a completely different route. It
was diabolus in Late Latin and diabolos in Greek, from the word diaballein, which
actually meant to slander, attack, or throw across. Seriously, the ballein meant to throw and dia means
across.
Wow, some words sure do change.
Malevolent showed up in the
sixteenth century from the Middle French
malivolent and classical Latin malevolentem, which, yeah, is just
malevolent. The male part means ill, poorly, or badly (no comment) and the volentem comes from velle,
to wish or want. To wish or want
bad stuff is pretty malevolent. Similarly, malice showed up in the fourteenth century from the Old French
malice. In Latin, it’s malitia, malice,
from malus, bad. It just lacks the wishing
part.
Wicked showed up in the thirteenth century, although in
the twelfth century they had wick,
which meant the same thing. It’s thought to be from the Old English wicca, witch,
and interestingly enough was a past participle without a verb (that means that
wick was also always past tense, too).
You can be wicked but you can’t
wick!
Sources
Tony Jebson’s
page on the Origins of
Old English
I don't want to wick anyway.
ReplyDeleteWhat about wickets?
You'd think that evil and lawyer would have the same root.
ReplyDeleteAnd, of course, the other synonyms:
ReplyDeleteNazi, GOP, etc...
I guess wicked is always in retrospect?
ReplyDelete